Latest From My Blog

Showing posts with label PLA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PLA. Show all posts

For Better Attribution Modeling – Do We Use AdWords or Analytics?

- Credit goes to Corina Marcano (original author) & PPCHero.com  Original link

A few days back I read this post about AdWords’ Attribution Modeling being released within the UI. It is a great feature to have in AdWords, but as mentioned in the post, this information does not show us the whole story. In this article I will compare Attribution Modeling in AdWords and Analytics.
What are the main differences in how Attribution Modeling works in AdWords and Analytics?
AdWords Attribution Models allow us to understand how PPC campaigns interact with each other, while Analytics Attribution Models allows us to understand how multi-channels interact with each other during the conversion path.
Putting aside the fact that Analytics is able to show multi-channel interactions while AdWords isn’t, I will limit this analysis to PPC data. There are a few specific models in Analytics that seem interesting to define:
  1. Last AdWords Click: This model attributes 100% of the conversion value to the most recent AdWords ad that the consumer clicked on before converting. So if a consumer clicked once on your ad and then converted from another source of traffic, this type of model will attribute the conversion to the last clicked AdWords campaign.
  2. Last Interaction: This model attributes the conversion to the last touch point from ALL sources of traffic. So if you click on an ad and come back directly a week later and converted, Analytics will not attribute this conversion to AdWords but to direct traffic.
  3. First Interaction: This model attributes the conversion to the first touch point from ALL sources of traffic. So if you click on an ad and come back organically a week later and converted, Analytics will attribute this conversion to AdWords and not to organic traffic.
  4. The Custom Model: The most important model! In this model it is you who decides the rules of attribution. Imagine that you are running branded and generic campaigns. Maybe your client thinks that branded conversions are not as valuable as generic since the consumer was already looking for their brand. This type of model will allow you to assign a specific value to brand conversions compared to generic conversions. You could say that you want each branded conversion to be counted as half of a generic conversion.
On the other hand, AdWords tracks conversions with the model “Last Non-Direct Click”. This model ignores direct visits and attributes 100% of the conversion value to the last channel the consumer clicked on before converting, in this case PPC.
Another important difference is the expiration of each cookie. The default expiration time of AdWords’ cookie is 30 days while the expiration of the Google Analytics campaign cookie (__utmz) is set to 6 months by default.
For example, if you click on an ad and then come back directly from a bookmark, or by directly typing the URL within 30 days, this conversion will be attributed to your PPC campaign and accounted for in AdWords (attributed to the day of the click). This will not be the case if the conversion happens on day 31. However, Analytics will attribute this last conversion to AdWords (CPC) on the date it happened.
If you need to better understand the differences between AdWords and Analytics regarding conversion data, I strongly recommend reading this post.
Let’s look at it with a more specific example
I chose a few campaigns that were paused on December 31st so no additional conversions will be attributed to them in AdWords because of the 30 day window.
1.       For December 2013, this is the information I received from AdWords:
AdWords Attribution Data
As you see on the last line, there is no difference on the total conversions between each model. This is because with Attribution Models within AdWords, you are only able to see how your AdWords campaigns interacted with each other, but you cannot see how they impacted other sources of traffic.
2.       For the same month, this is the information I received from Analytics:
Attribution data from Google Analytics
The information we see in AdWords corresponds to the Model of “Last Non-Direct Click Conversions”. If we look closely at the data for the model “Last AdWords Click Conversion” we realize that CPC contributed to almost 35% more conversions than what it is accounted for in AdWords. Similarly, looking at the “First Interaction Model” and the “Last Interaction Model” we realize that AdWords has been credited for 2.2% more and 25% more conversions respectively when users came back directly to the website or through a bookmark.
Looking at the same data in Analytics, but for February 2014, I noticed the following:
Google Analytics Attribution Data
CPC is still getting conversions attributed to after the campaigns have been paused and the 30 day window has expired!
PPC, a part of a whole
PPC should not be analyzed by itself. It is a piece, small or big, of a bigger puzzle and these campaigns have a lot more impact on bringing conversions than what we are able to see within AdWords. Analytics allows us to see a greater part of the puzzle and this is exactly the type of information that will definitely help us, digital marketers, to explain to clients the real impact PPC.
As Google evangelist Avinash Kaushik would say, “Optimize for the journey, not for a one night stand”.
So which one do you think is better?
*Note that the differences in Last non-direct click conversions (Analytics Chart) and Conversions (AdWords chart) are due to the 30 days window attribution, the time duration of each cookie, and the date the conversion is accounted for.

Webinar --- Battle for Power in a Marketing Landscape

- Credit goes to PPCHero. Original link

Stretching the marketing dollar can be a daily battle and with the continuous tussle for PPC in particular, you’ve probably had your share of challenging issues and questions. How do you prioritize your marketing dollars? When should you think about moving your marketing budget around? How do you handle “micro-managing” of your PPC accounts? Should you hire an agency for PPC marketing, an in-house staff member, or go the automated path?
In the recording below, digital advertising experts from Hanapin, Searchforce, and Cabela’s talk marketing and contend their daily power struggles from their each unique perspectives, which cover every facet of the industry: an agency, in-house team, and automation software.
You’ll get expert-level PPC tips like:
*How to be a successful gladiator for your PPC accounts
*Insight into the different perspectives of PPC marketing
*How the market landscape can affect your PPC budgeting decisions
*How to tackle “micro-managing” of a PPC budget
Prepare for the ultimate battle of insights, tips, and expert-advice!
Here is the webinar recording:

Webinar Link


And here is the slideshare presentation:

 Slidshare Link

Do You Know Product Listing Ads Can Steal Your Conversion

If you’ve ever done a Google search, you know already that Google ads are occupying more and more space on the SERP. What you might not know is that the fancy Product Listing Ads you see are commercial intent-sucking monsters and are stealing all the conversions from both the organic and non-PLA search results.
Today, when someone searches for anything related to a product name, Google automatically populates most of the above-the-fold space on the SERP with PLAs and other blinged-out ads:

Product Listing Ads

When I search on “keurig coffee maker,” about 80% of the screen is devoted to sponsored results featuring keurig products– I have to scroll below the fold to see more than two organic listings. All the ads you can see here make use of extensions (such as offer extensions, location extensions, etc.) but the PLAs are especially compelling because of the image and price information. 

Last year, we did some research on ad-filled SERPS like this and found that about two-thirds of clicks on commercial searches go to the ads, leaving less than half of the clicks for organic results.
Here’s what you may not have realized before: The third of clicks that are left, after you take out the people that have clicked on ads, are significantly less valuable to your business.

Why? Because all the intent has been sucked out of the SERP.  How exactly does this happen?

Commercial Intent in Search is a Zero Sum Game

 

When people execute a search like “keurig coffee maker,” some of those people are going to be further down in the funnel looking to buy now, while others are just looking to learn more about them.

The people with higher commercial intent who know exactly what they want – for example, a Keurig Elite single-serve coffee maker – are drawn right to the ad that shows them:
  • The name of the product they’re looking for
  • A picture of the product they’re looking for
  • The price
  • Where they can order it from
 PLAs make it super-easy for people at the end of the funnel to go ahead and convert, because the ads show searchers exactly what they want and take them right to an e-commerce landing page so they can buy.

On the other hand, the people who are scrolling past those ads and clicking on organic results very likely have less commercial intent. They’re probably in the research phase of the funnel – they may be looking for reviews or just trying to figure out what a Keurig is – so they are less likely to buy during that search session, and may never convert to a sale at all.

Ad Text

 

It’s Not Just About SEO: PLAs Steal Intent-Driven Clicks from Other PPC Ads

 

Is commercial intent in search really a zero sum game? It would normally be difficult to prove a claim like I’m making – that PLAs are intent-vacuums, sucking all the commercial intent out of a SERP.

However, in AdWords, it’s currently possible to display two ads for the same keyword – both a standard text ad and a PLA. Companies that have just started running both kinds of ads have a rare opportunity to A/B test how the addition of PLA’s impacts their regular text ads.

At the Search Insider Summit in Florida last month, I attended a roundtable discussion on product listing ads with several big-brand PPC managers who all revealed the same thing: their PLAs were kicking ass but also sucking conversions away from their run-of-the-mill text ads.

Meaning, the increase in ROI from running PLA’s was at the expense of the other text ads they were running – you can’t double your sales by running both types of ads. As a result, all of the advertisers I spoke to were primarily shifting budget from vanilla plain text ads towards PLA’s as opposed to creating completely new budgets.

I believe this is because the PLAs are so information-rich. Prospective customers know exactly what they’ll be getting when they click on the ad, including the price. With a standard text ad, on the other hand, you run the risk of getting the click and then losing the sale, if people decide they don’t want to pay that much for your product or that it’s not exactly what they were picturing.

If You’re an E-Commerce Business and You’re Not Using PLA’s, Good Luck!

 

PLAs are just one more way that GOOG is sticking it to non-advertisers. Google is creating an environment in which you have to use AdWords to compete in search. You may still be able to rank on the first page for your product keywords, but those listings are not only getting pushed further and further down the page, they’re significantly less valuable since the commercial intent has been drained out of the SERP already by the competing Product Listing ads at the top of the SERP.

And it’s not just about SEO vs. PPC. It’s getting to the point where standard-issue text ads aren’t enough – you have to use all the bells and whistles that Google makes available to you. Otherwise you can’t hope to compete. If you’re an e-commerce company, it’s crucial that you set up a Merchant Center Account so you’re eligible for PLAs and dynamic remarketing.

If you’ve tried running PLAs and regular text ads on the same keywords, what were your results?
+